Home | Newsroom | Advertising | Foundation | Job Bank | ANAgrams | Legal Services | Contact Us | Public Notices
Public
Notices























 Public Notice

County: Pima
Printed In: Daily Territorial (Tucson)
Printed On: 2026/06/05

Public Notice:

MINUTES, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEETING
APRIL 8, 2026
The Pima County Board of
Supervisors met in Regular Session at
the regular meeting place of the Pima
County Board of Supervisors on the First
Floor of the Administration Building of
the Governmental Center, Tucson,
Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, April
8, 2003. Upon roll call, those present
and absent were as follows:
Present: Sharon Bronson, Chair
Richard Elias, Vice Chair
Ray Carroll, Member
Ann Day, Member
Dan Eckstrom, Member
Lori Godoshian, Clerk
Absent: None
REGULAR AGENDA
1. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor
Jimmy Munns of First Assembly of God.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
All present joined in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
... EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Elias, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, that the
Board convene to Executive Session at
9:14 a.m. relating to:
A. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction on
whether to appeal the decision in
Nordbrock v. Pima County, Pima County
Superior Court Case No. C2002-5474.
B. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction
regarding approval of a Tax Appeal
Settlement Recommendation on Palo
Verde/Irvington Investors, L.L.C., Parcel
No. 132-20-1060.
ADDENDUM
C. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction to
seek settlement approval of Superior
Court Case No. C20005865, Awana v.
Pima County, et. al.
3. RECONVENE
The Board of Supervisors meeting
reconvened at 9:20 a.m. All members
were present.
ADDENDUM
4. LITIGATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction to
seek settlement approval of Superior
Court Case No. C20005865, Awana v.
Pima County, et. al.
Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy
County Attorney, stated this case
involved a sexual harassment claim
against the Medical Examiner's Office.
The County Attorney's Office
recommended a settlement in the
amount of $95,000.00.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to accept the County
Attorney's Office recommendation.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. LITIGATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction
regarding approval of a Tax Appeal
Settlement Recommendation on Palo
Verde/Irvington Investors, L.L.C., Parcel
No. 132-20-1060.
Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy
County Attorney, reported the case dealt
with a tax appeal in which the Pima
County Assessor's Office had assessed
the property owned by Palo
Verde/Irvington Investors, L.L.C., at a
full cash value of $1,765,413.00. The
property owner provided documentation
of the property improvements at the time
of the appeal and it was determined by
the Pima County Assessor's Office that
there was sufficient evidence showing a
decrease in improvement value and
recommended reducing the full cash
value to $1,118,530.00.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to accept the County
Attorney's Office recommendation.
6. LITIGATION
The Board of Supervisors on April 1,
2003, continued the following to this
date:
Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3)
and (4), for legal advice and direction on
whether to appeal the decision in
Nordbrock v. Pima County, Pima County
Superior Court Case No. C2002-5474.
Without objection, this item was
removed from the agenda at staff's
request.
7. PROCUREMENT - CANCELLATION
AND RE-AWARD OF CONTRACT:
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
A. Cancellation of award made on
February 11, 2026 to Twin Peaks
Construction Inc., of Nevada for the Kino
Community Hospital 5th Floor
Improvement Project.
B. Award of contract for the Kino
Community Hospital 4th Floor
Improvements to the second low bidder
Sellers and Sons, Inc. (Corporate
Headquarters: Tucson, AZ) in the
amount of $280,250.00 for the base bid
plus Alternate 1, 1997 Bond Fund.
Without objection, this item was
removed from the agenda at staff's
request.
8. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING CLOSURE
Co9-02-21, DANALEWICH FAMILY
TRUST - NORTH DOUBLE TJ RANCH
ROAD EASEMENT REZONING
Without objection, the item was
withdrawn.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard on any item listed for
action on the Consent Calendar.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Eckstrom, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, that the
Consent Calendar be approved subject
to the following:
REMOVED FOR SEPARATE ACTION
D-2. El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood
Health Center, Inc., Amendment No. 4,
to provide dental, primary care
physician, specialty and obstetrical
care services, extend contract term to
3/31/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract
amount $1,350,000.00
(18-15-E-128368-1100) Pima Health
System
Janet Searle, representing Jobs for
Justice, stated she would like the Board
to reconsider awarding this contract to
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health
Center Inc. She said that El Rio has a
history of unfair labor practices and
urged the Board to deny this contract
award.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Eckstrom, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to
continue this item to the Board of
Supervisors regular meeting of April 15,
2003.
* * *
REMOVED FOR SEPARATE ACTION
F-1. Synagro West, Inc., Amendment
No. 4, to provide biosolid management
services and extend contract term to
12/31/04, WWM Operating Fund,
contract amount $1,549,160.31
(11-03-P-120811-1095) Wastewater
Management
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, to approve the award of contract.
A roll call vote was requested.
Upon the roll call vote being taken, the
motion failed by a two to three vote,
Supervisors Carroll, Eckstrom and Elias
voting "Nay._
It was thereupon moved by Supervisor
Elias, seconded by Supervisor Carroll,
to deny the amendment and have a
re-submittal of bids for this contract.
A roll call vote was requested.
Upon the roll call vote being taken, the
motion carried by a three to two vote,
Chair Bronson and Supervisor Day
voting "Nay._
* * *
REMOVED FOR SEPARATE ACTION
2-B. RFP 70052-02 Public
Relation/Community Outreach and
Education (Transportation/
Transportation Special Revenue Fund)
contract amount $100,000.00 each, to
the following:
Vendor Corporate Headquarters
Kaneen Adv./Pub. Relations Inc.
Tucson, Az
Gordley Design Group. Inc. Tucson, AZ
International Media Tucson, AZ
Michael Bolchalk Marketing Tucson,
AZ
Lesher Comm. and Leavitt Comm.
Fallbrook, CA
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to continue
this item to the Board of Supervisors
regular meeting of May 6, 2003.
* * *
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE
AS FOLLOWS:
PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENTS,
CON TRACTS AND/OR AMENDMENTS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -62,
approving an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the Arizona Department
of Health Services, to provide for the
Folic Acid Grant Program, Federal Fund,
contract amount $81,780.00 revenue
(01-01-A-132135-0403) Health
Department
***
B. Catholic Community Services,
d.b.a. Adelante Program, Amendment
No. 2, to provide transportation services
for the One Stop Career Center, YO and
WIA Grant Funds, contract amount
$10,000.00 (11-39-A-130567-0402)
Community Services
C. Goodman's, Inc., Amendment No. 2,
to provide as-needed system furniture
re-configuration services, extend
contract term to 4/30/04 and amend
scope of work, Various Department
Funds, contract amount $50,000.00
(11-13-G-128941-0501) Facilities
Management
D. Ajo Ambulance, Inc., Amendment
No. 2, to provide emergency and
non-emergency ambulance
transportation services, extend contract
term to 5/31/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $180,000.00
(11-15-A-127344-0400) Pima Health
System
D-1. Tucson Associates in
Nephrology, Amendment No. 1, to
provide nephrology services, extend
contract term to 3/31/04 and amend
contractual language, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount $125,000.00
(07-15-T-128638-0201) Pima Health
System
D-2. El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood
Health Center, Inc., (REMOVED FOR
SEPARATE ACITON)
D-3. Heartland Hospice, to provide
hospice services, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount not to exceed
$100,000.00 (07-15-H-132119-0403)
Pima Health System
D-4. American Associated Druggists,
Inc., d.b.a. United Drugs, Amendment
No. 3, to provide prescription processing
services, extend contract term to
3/31/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $300,000.00
(07-15-A-127410-0400) Pima Health
System
D-5. American Associated Druggists,
Inc., d.b.a. United Drugs, Amendment
No. 4, to provide prescription processing
services and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund, no
cost (07-15-A-127410-0400) Pima Health
System
D-6. Pima Heart Physicians, P.C.,
Amendment No. 4, to provide
cardiology/cardiac rehabilitation
services, extend contract term to
4/30/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $300,000.00
(18-15-P-127300-0400) Pima Health
System
D-7. Jeffery A. Palen, D.O.,
Amendment No. 2, to provide
obstetrical/gynecological services and
extend contract term to 4/30/04, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, contract amount
$300,000.00 (18-15-P-129829-1001)
Pima Health System
D-8. Old Pueblo Anesthesia,
Amendment No. 3, to provide
anesthesia services, extend contract
term to 6/30/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $500,000.00
(07-15-O-127440-0500) Pima Health
System
D-9. Sun Alliance Healthcare
Services, d.b.a. Pacific Mobile
Diagnostics, Amendment No. 2, to
provide mobile
radiology/electrocardiogram services,
extend contract term to 4/30/04 and
amend contractual language, no cost
(07-15-S-128781-0401) Pima Health
System
D-10 Easter Seals Arizona, Inc.,
Amendment No. 5, to provide home
health care services, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount $100,000.00
(11-15-E-128175-0800) Pima Health
System
D-11 Cholla Pediatrics, Amendment
No. 3, to provide pediatric primary care
physician services and extend contract
term to 4/30/04, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $90,000.00
(18-15-C-129169-0601) Pima Health
System
E. Arizona Home and Healthcare,
Amendment No. 4, to provide nursing
supplemental staffing agreement for
Kino Hospital ($920,000.00) and Posada
Del Sol ($129,000.00) and extend
contract term to 6/30/04, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, total contract amount
$1,040,000.00 (07-06-A-129586-0701)
F. Engineering and Environmental
Consultants, Inc., Amendment No. 1, to
provide miscellaneous engineering and
design services and extend contract
term to 8/11/03 and amend scope of
work, WWM Operating Fund, no cost
(16-03-E-130611-0202) Wastewater
Management
F-1. Synagro West, Inc., (REMOVED
FOR SEPARATE ACTION)
PROCUREMENT
A. IFB 59400 Voluntary vehicle repair
and retrofit program (Automotive
Services/Special Revenue Fund) total
amount to each zone $95,000.00
including tax, to the following:
Zone Vendor Corporate Headquarters
1 Econo Lube and Tune Tucson, AZ
2 Auto Max Tucson, AZ
3 Budget Automotive Tucson, AZ
4 Accurate Service Tucson, AZ
5 Fletcher's Tire Tucson, AZ
B. RFP 70052-02 (REMOVED FOR
SEPARATE ACTION)
DIVISION OF ELECTIONS
Pursuant to A.R.S. 16-821B, approval
of Precinct Committeemen
Resignation/Appointments:
RESIGNATION PRECINCT PARTY
Krug, Penny 014 REP
APPOINTMENTS PRECINCT PARTY
Mawhinney, John 012 REP
Dougherty, John M. 045 REP
Harris, Tyler J. 062 REP
Seat, Peter 062 REP
Davies, Virginia A. 083 REP
Gaddy, Norma J. 093 REP
Harvey, Christine M. 096 REP
Burkes, Robert J. 101 DEM
Towle, Doris R. 128 REP
Schechter, J.D. 145 REP
French, Kasi R. 158 REP
Landikusic, Laura L. 162 DEM
Ashley, Ralph C. 164 REP
Quirk, Lydia I. 170 REP
Quirk, Winton 170 REP
Murchison, Bruce P. 177 REP
Kruppa, Victor D. 181 REP
Weller, Scott D. 185 REP
Legate, Jim W. 209 REP
Everett, Douglas D. 241 REP
Bosse, Steve 243 REP
Ballard, Daniel C. 253 REP
Longino, Jamie P. 253 REP
Baker, Tim H. 270 REP
Gomez, Ignacio G. 292 REP
Bradley, Patricia A. 297 REP
DeHaan, Donna E. 302 REP
Donges, Carolyn R. 327 REP
Marcus, Kenneth M. 329 REP
Thorne, Myrtle E. 341 DEM
McClure, Marian A. 367 REP
Nelson, Clint 369 REP
Scolpini, Calvin 372 REP
Kleving, Michael I. 382 REP
Grant, Jeffrey B. 386 REP
Krug, Penny 386 REP
Carey Jr., Robert E. 387 REP
Carey, Valerie M. 387 REP
SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE
AP PROVED PURSUANT TO
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-273
Jamison Brown for Tucson Audubon
Society, at Mason Audubon Center,
8751 N. Thornydale Road, May 3, 2003.
REAL PROPERTY
A. Water Franchises
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 63 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, authorizing a franchise granted
to Diablo Village Water Company, to
supply water in Sections 5, 6, 8, 9, 10,
16, 17, 18 and 21, T15S, R12E, G&SRM.
No Revenue. (District 3)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 64 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, authorizing a franchise granted
to Thim Utility Company, to supply water
in Sections 30, T14S, R12E, G&SRM,
Sections 5 and 6, T16S, R14E, G&SRM,
Section 7, T15S, R11E, G&SRM,
Sections 20, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33,
34 and 35, T15S, R10E, G&SRM and
Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 11 and 24, T16S,
R10E, G&SRM. No Revenue. (District 3)
3. RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 65 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, authorizing a franchise granted
to Thim Water Corporation, to supply
water in Sections 3, 4, 9, 10 and 11,
T16S, R10E, G&SRM. No Revenue.
(District 3)
B. Abandonment and Quit Claim Deed
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 66 , of the
Pima County Board of Supervisors
providing for the vacation of a portion of
Nubs Lake Drive, as Pima County Road
Abandonment No. A-02-19, in Section 9,
T16S, R16E, G&SRM. (District 4)
2. Quit Claim Deed to Fidelity National
Title Agency, Inc., as Trustee under
Trust No. 10756, for a portion of Nubs
Lake Drive in Section 9, T16S, R16E,
G&SRM. No revenue. (District 4)
PROCLAMATIONS
A. Proclaiming the week of May 18
through May 24, 2026 to be:
_NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
INSURANCE WOMEN WEEK_
B. Proclaiming the week of April 27
through May 3, 2026 to be:
"NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK"
C. Proclaiming the day of April 11,
2003 to be:
"PIMA COUNTY D.A.R.E. DAY_
RATIFY AND/OR APPROVE
Minutes: February 11, 2026
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: CLAS
SIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
Staff requests approval to create a new
classification of Administrative Support
Specialist-Senior. There is no immediate
budget impact.
CLASS CLASS EEO,O/T
CODE TITLE GRADE CODE
1168 Admin. Suppt. 30 E, NE*
Specialist-Senior ($25,599-$39,414)
*NE = Not Exempt, Paid Time
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the above.
11. PROCUREMENT - AWARD OF
CON TRACT: FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT
Health and Welfare Building Elevator
Modernization. Staff recommends
Amtech Elevator Services (Corporate
Headquarters: Anaheim, CA) in the
amount of $514,030.00 for the base bid
plus Alternate 1. Bond Fund.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by
Supervisor Day, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to approve
the award of contract.
12. PROCUREMENT - AWARD OF
CON TRACT: TRANSPORTATION
Asphaltic Concrete Overlay. Staff
recommends Southern Arizona Paving
and Construction Company, Inc.,
(Corporate Headquarters: Tucson, AZ)
estimated contract amount
$1,062,122.50. Transportation Operating
Fund.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the award of
contract.
13. PROCUREMENT: APPEAL OF
PRO CUREMENT DIRECTOR'S
DECISION
Solicitation No. 68945
Pursuant to Pima County Code,
Section 11.20.010(J), Spencer A. Smith,
Attorney, representing Diggins and Sons
Power Sweeping Inc., appeals the
decision of the Procurement Director
regarding Solicitation No. 68945, Road
Sweeping.
Kurt Weinrich, Director of
Transportation and Flood Control District,
stated this was an appeal of the
Procurement Director's decision in
which the Board has been provided with
the criteria used in determining the
award of contract. Staff's
recommendation is to deny the appeal.
Paul Diggins, appellant, stated after
reviewing the contract it was found that
they were not able to implement the
requirements as outlined in the contract.
An alternate scheduled was submitted in
order to meet the rules and regulations of
the PM-10 requirements which included
a monthly street sweeping schedule of
the urban street areas. He felt that the
bid award does not meet the intended
goal of Pima County and does not
conform with the Clean Water and Clean
Air Act. He urged the Board to overturn
the Procurement Director's decision.
Supervisor Carroll asked if Pima
County could apply for Federal funding
to subsidize the cost?
Chuck Huckelberry, County
Administrator, stated Pima County had
previously applied for Federal funding
and was denied. The probability of
receiving Federal funding at this point in
time is zero.
Supervisor Carroll stated there seems
to some mis-communication between
the bidders and it would be more cost
effective to award the contract to a local
company versus an out-of-state
company. He felt that the contract
needed to be rebid with the
understanding that the street sweeping
would occur quarterly. Supervisor Carroll
asked if it would be beneficial to Pima
County to have the contract rebid?
Mr. Huckelberry replied the
requirements were stated in the contract
and it's been the practice of Pima
County to award the contract to the
lowest bidder. Legally there is nothing
from preventing an out-of-state company
from bidding on Pima County contracts.
Aaron Packard, representing Great
American Sweeping, stated although
their company headquarters is based in
Colorado, their office has been in
operation in Phoenix, Arizona, for over a
year.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to deny the appeal and
uphold the Procurement Director's
decision.
It was thereupon moved by Supervisor
Carroll to reconsider the item. The
motion died for lack of a second.
14. PROCUREMENT: AWARD OF
CON TRACT
Roadway Sweeping. Staff
recommends Great American Sweeping
(Corporate Headquarters: Phoenix, AZ
Henderson, CO) in the amount of
$336,028.41.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Day, and carried by a four to
one vote, Supervisor Carroll voting
"Nay,_ to approve the award of contract.
15. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AU
THORITY
A. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 67 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, approving the proceedings of
the Industrial Development Authority of
the County of Pima, regarding the
issuance of its not to exceed
$15,000,000.00 Education Revenue
Bonds, Series 2003 (Bell Canyon and
West Gilbert Schools Project) and
declaring an emergency.
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 68 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, approving the proceedings of
the Industrial Development Authority of
the County of Pima, regarding the
issuance of its not to exceed
$50,000,000.00 Single Family Mortgage
Revenue Bonds, Draw Down Series
2003 and declaring an emergency.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to pass and adopt
Resolution Nos. 2003- 67 and 2003 - 68.
16. TRANSPORTATION:
ACCEPTANCE OF ROADWAYS FOR
MAINTENANCE
A. Co12-86-86A, Mission West II,
Phase II, Lots 446-506. Developer:
Richmond American Homes. (District 3)
B. P1201-093, San Pedro Estates,
Lots 1-23. Developer: Valley
Development Group.
(District 3)
C. P1299-085, Santa Rita Springs,
Parcel E, Lots 1-35 and Common Areas
A and B. Developer: Dorn Homes.
(District 4)
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the acceptance
of roadways for maintenance.
17.
FRANCHISES/LICENSES/PERMITS:
LIQUOR LICENSES
A. 03-08-8685, Melanie J. Crosby,
d.b.a. Valley Mart, 16560 W. Avra
Valley Road, Marana, Series 10, Beer
and Wine Store License, New License.
B. 03-09-8686, Robert D. Mahlstede,
d.b.a. Roadrunner Depot, 16455 N.
Oracle Road, Catalina, Series 10, Beer
and Wine Store License, New License.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard. No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearings and
approve the requests as presented and
forward the recommendations to the
State Liquor Control Board.
18.
FRANCHISES/LICENSES/PERMITS:
FIREWORKS PERMITS
A. John Baker, d.b.a. Pima County
Fairgrounds, 11300 S. Houghton Road,
April 18, 2026 at approximately 9:00
p.m.
B. John Baker, d.b.a. Pima County
Fairgrounds, 11300 S. Houghton Road,
April 25, 2026 at approximately 9:00
p.m.
C. Troy Finley, d.b.a. Tucson Country
Club, 2950 Camino Principal, May 3,
2003 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
D. Troy Finley, d.b.a. Tucson Country
Club, 2950 Camino Principal, July 4,
2003 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
E. Troy Finley, d.b.a. Tucson Country
Club, 2950 Camino Principal, July 5,
2003 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
F. Troy Finley, d.b.a. Tucson Country
Club, 2950 Camino Principal, July 12,
2003 at approximately 8:00 p.m.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard. No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearings and
approve the Fireworks Permits.
ADDENDUM
19. FRANCHISE/LICENSE/PERMIT:
EX TENSION OF PREMISES/PATIO
PERMIT
Alice J. Mazon, d.b.a. Papagayo
Mexican Restaurant and Cantina, 4717
E. Sunrise Dr., Temporary Permit for
May 3, 2003.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard. No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearing and
approve the request for the Extension of
Premises/Patio Permit.
REGULAR AGENDA
20. RECESS
Without objection, Chair Bronson
declared a closed captionist recess at
10:25 a.m.
21. RECONVENE
The Board of Supervisors meeting
reconvened at 10:45 a.m. All Board
Members were present.
22. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: AP
PEAL OF HEARING OFFICER
DECISION
P02ZV00357-1 and 2, RALPH AND JU
DITH SHARP
In accordance with Pima County
Zoning Code Section 18.95.030D, Ralph
and Judith Sharp appeal the decision of
the Hearing Officer in Case Nos.
P02ZV00357, 1 and 2, on property
located at 12595 E. Los Reales Road,
regarding violations of Section
18.07.030C, open storage of junk and
used materials; and Sections 18.21.010
and 18.21.020, auto repair not a
permitted use. (District 4)
Tom Hudson, Senior Planner, reported
the appellants are appealing the Hearing
Officer's decision as they were found
responsible for having open storage of
junk materials on the property and for
repairing automobiles on the property
without a permit. The Hearing Officer
issued a total of $1,500.00 in fines with
$100.00 being due within 14 days, and
the balance of $1,400.00 being
suspended for 30 days subject to the
appellants being in compliance. If the
property continued to be out of
compliance, the balance would then be
due and payable. If the property was
found to be in compliance, the balance
would be suspended for one year
subject to the appellants remaining in
compliance for one year. If after one year
there are no further violations, the fines
would be waived.
Ralph Sharp, appellant, stated he did
not deny that the property was not in
compliance but, since the last
inspection, the property had been
brought into compliance. Mr. Sharp
stated according to his interpretation of
Pima County Code Section 18.21.010, it
does allow for auto repair on the
property. He stated that his hobbies
include repairing vehicles. The vehicles
on the property are currently registered
under his name and that he personally
maintains all his vehicles.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to close the public
hearing and uphold the Hearing Officer's
decision but to reduce the fine amount to
$50.00 subject to the appellant
remaining in compliance for one year.
23. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: AP
PEAL OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION
P02ZV00394 and P02ZV00395, FRAN
CISCO AND ALMA OTHON
In accordance with Pima County
Zoning Code Section 18.95.030D,
Francisco and Alma Othon appeal the
decision of the Hearing Officer in Case
Nos. P02ZV00394 and P02ZV00395, on
property located at 3224 and 3232 3228
E. Melton Milton Road, re garding
violations of Section 18.01.030 E.1 with
respect to structures without zoning
permits. (District 2)
Tom Hudson, Senior Planner, reported
the appellants are appealing the Hearing
Officer's decision regarding having
structures on the property without zoning
permits. The properties in question are
located at 3224 and 3228 E. Milton
Road.
Chair Bronson asked for clarification
regarding the address in questioned as
the advertised agenda referenced a
different address.
Mr. Hudson clarified the address
confusion and stated the properties in
question are 3224 and 3228 E. Milton
Road. He stated that the address of 3232
E. Milton was dismissed.
Chair Bronson asked if the Board
could proceed with the hearing since
one of the properties in questioned had
not been advertised?
Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy
County Attorney, stated according to
case law, if the description of the
property can sufficiently be determined,
it is at the Board's discretion whether or
not they wish to proceed with the
hearing.
Chair Bronson stated since staff has
made the correction regarding the
address and there were people waiting to
speak on the item, she would continue
the hearing.
Mr. Hudson stated that on February 27,
2003, a hearing was held regarding the
alleged violations in which the
appellants failed to appear and the
Hearing Officer found the Othons'
responsible for the violations. The
Hearing Officer gave the appellants 30
days to bring the property into
compliance. After 30 days, if the
appellants did not bring the properties
into compliance, a $100.00 a day fine
per violation would be imposed until the
properties were found to be in
compliance. Mr. Hudson urged the
Board to uphold the Hearing Officer's
decision.
Francisco Luis Othon, appellant,
stated he had purchased the property
two years ago and was unaware of any
violations regarding these properties.
Mr. Othon said he was confused as to
the time of the hearing and
subsequently arrived at the time he
thought the hearing was to be
conducted. He was advised that the
hearing was held in his absence, and
the Hearing Officer found him
responsible of the violations. He
requested the Board allow him
additional time to meet with County
officials and try to bring his properties
into compliance. Ms. Othon stated it is
their intention to bring the properties into
compliance without causing any
hardship on the residents.
The following individuals addressed
the Board in opposition to the Hearing
Officer's decision:
1. Ivette Othon
2. Barbara Harrington
3. Wayne Hollman
4. Norma Chrestman
The speakers provided the following
reasons for their opposition:
a. The appellant was not aware that
3228 E. Milton address was in
existence at the time of purchase.
b. These mobile homes have been on
the property for years without any
complaints or citations filed against the
owner.
c. The mobile homes are very fragile
and to try to relocate them would cause
them to collapse.
d. The mobiles placed on the
properties were in accordance to the
Codes at that particular time.
e. Permits were not required at the
time the mobile homes were placed on
the property.
f. With additional time the residents
could try and bring the properties and
mobile homes into compliance in
accordance to the Code.
g. No one was ever informed as to any
violations on the properties and to have
these mobile homes relocated would be
a hardship on some families.
Supervisor Eckstrom inquired as to
what needs to be done in order for the
appellants to be in compliance?
Ms. Richter replied that an analysis of
the properties needed to be done before
that question could be answered. She
suggested the Board consider
remanding this appeal back to the
Hearing Officer for another hearing on
the matter and to instruct staff to
investigate the issues of
non-conforming use, the correct address
of the properties, and if there is any way
to bring the properties into compliance.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by
Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried
by a five to zero vote, to close the
public hearing and remand this item
back to the Hearing Officer for further
review. Also to direct staff to clear up
the address confusion and work with
residents regarding non-conforming use
and to try to bring them into compliance.
24. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING CLOSURE
Co9-93-66, MADDEN - JUNIPER
ROAD REZONING
Request of Billie Jane Madden, et. al.,
to close Co9-93-66, a rezoning from SR
(Suburban Ranch) to CB-1 (Local
Business) of 3.40 acres located on the
northeast corner of Juniper Road and
Gilbert Street, approximately 1/4 mile
north of Ina Road and _ mile west of
Thornydale Road. This rezoning was ap
proved in 1994 and expired on March 1,
2002. Staff recommends CLOSURE.
(District 3)
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
stated the property owner was applying
for CR-1 rezoning but has since
changed her mind. Staff recommends
the property be reverted back to SR
zoning.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to close the public hearing
and approve the rezoning closure.
25. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING CLOSURE
Co9-97-25, WANSLEE - LA CHOLLA
BOULEVARD REZONING
Proposal to close Co9-97-25, a
rezoning from SR (Suburban Ranch) to
TR (Transitional) of 4.55 acres located
on the west side of La Cholla Boulevard,
approximately 1/4 mile north of
Oracle-Jaynes Station Road and _ mile
south of Orange Grove Road. The
rezoning was approved in 1997 and
expired on November 18, 2002. Staff
recommends AGAINST CLOSURE.
(District 1)
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported staff is recommending that this
case stay open to allow the property
owner to pursue a time extension.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Eckstrom, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to close
the public hearing approve staff's
recommendation.
26. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
PLAT NOTE MODIFICATION
P1297-087, SAGUARO CLIFFS (LOT
28)
Request of Robert and Donna Snyder,
rep resented by Craig Morton, for a plat
note modification of the one-foot access
control easement depicted on the plat in
order to allow an individual direct
driveway access to the subject lot from
Trails End Road. The subject lot is 2.10
acres, zoned SR [Suburban Ranch
(Cluster)] and is located on the
southwest corner of Trails End Road and
Placita Tuberia, approximately one mile
west of Camino de Oeste. Staff has NO
OBJEC TION, SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS. (Dis trict 5)
"Staff has NO OBJECTION to the plat
note modification to allow direct access
to Lot 28 from Trails End Road subject
to the following conditions:






The plat note modification is contingent upon
Planning and Zoning Commission approval of a
variance to Section 18.69.040B.1.b (Subdivision
Street Design Standards) to allow the proposed
individual direct access to Lot 28 from Trails End
Road.







The property owners shall process through the
Real Property Division a release of the portion of
the one-foot access control easement along Trails
End Road for a driveway in the approximate width
and location as shown on the "Topo #1" site plan
for Lot 28. This driveway shall be the only access
drive to Lot 28, unless the one-foot access control
easement is re-established and the driveway is
re-vegetated with vegetation indigenous to the lot.







The driveway shall adhere to the driveway as
shown on the "Topo #1" site plan relative to the
approximate width and location and shall be
designed to allow vehicles to turn around on-site to
prevent the need for backing vehicles on to Trails
End Road. A paved turnout is required for the
driveway connection to Trails End Road.
4. The property owners shall revegetate existing
vehicular road/trail disturbance for those areas
within the lot which will not otherwise be disturbed
by the proposed development. The planned
revegetation shall be shown on the individual lot
landscape/preservation plan required as part of
permit approval for the proposed residence."
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official, reported the
applicant is requesting approval of a driveway
access off of Trails End Road. Staff has no
objections to the request subject to the standard
and special conditions. There has not been any
protest against this case.
Craig Morton, applicant, stated the purpose of
relocating the driveway access is to preserve the
pristine of the property and urged the Board to
approve the plat note modification request.
The following individual addressed the Board in
opposition of the Plat Note Modification:
1. Gary Kordosky
The speaker provided the following reasons for
his opposition:
a. Approving this plat note modification would set
a precedent for other property owners.
b. Moving the driveway access would create a
safety hazzard.
c. Allowing the driveway access from Trails End
Road would increase the potential risks for
accidents.
d. Motorists exceed the posted speed limit on
the road and it is hard to see the oncoming traffic
from this access.
Chair Bronson asked if a traffic study had been
done of the area?
Kurt Weinrich, Director of Transportation and
Flood Control District, reported that there had not
been a traffic study done of the area but could do
so at the Board's direction. He stated that Trails
End Road is a dead end road so traffic would be
limited. As for the excessive speed in the area,
there is not much traffic in the area and that could
be the reason for the excessive speed by
motorists.
On consideration, it was moved by Supervisor
Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero vote, to
continue this item for up to 30 days and to direct
staff to look into to the following issues and report
back to the Board on or before May 6, 2003: the
safety of having a driveway exit onto Placita
Tuberia; how to have the least disturbance to the
natural vegetation; and, would this set a precedent
for other residents wanting a driveway access onto
Placita Tuberia.
27. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING ORDINANCES
A. ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 37 ,
Co9-00- 62, Semper Investments, L.L.C.
- Bowes Road Rezoning (Zoning Plan).
Owner: Fidelity National Title TR 60044.
(District 4)
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 38 ,
Co9-02- 24, Fidelity National Title
Agency Trust No. 10,390, et. al. - Kolb
Road Rezoning. Owner: Lewis Holdings,
L.L.C. (District 4)
C. ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 39 ,
Co9-02- 29, Anaya - Oklahoma Street
Rezoning. Owner: Greg Anaya.
(District 3)
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Carroll, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to close the
unadvertised hearing and to pass and
adopt Ordinance Nos. 2003 - 37, 2003 -
38 and 2003 - 39.
28. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING RESOLUTIONS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 69 ,
Co9-00- 63, La Cholla Investments,
L.L.C. - La Cholla Boulevard No. 2
Rezoning. Owner: La Cholla
Investments, L.L.C. (District 1)
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 70 ,
Co9-97- 18, Hinkle - Ajo-Gila Bend
Highway Rezoning. Owner: Table Top
Telephone Company, Inc. (District 3)
C. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 71 ,
Co9-97- 08, Halfway Station, L.L.C. -
Tucson/Nogales Highway Rezoning.
Owner: H. Mac Ward, Jr. (District 3)
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to close the unadvertised
hearing and to pass and adopt
Resolution Nos. 2003 - 69, 2003 - 70
and 2003 - 71.
29. TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: PIMA COUNTY CODE
TEXT AMENDMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 40 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, relating to Capital
Improvements Funding and
Development Fees; repealing
Ordinances 1996-09, 1996-73 and
1997-23 in their entirety; repealing
Chapters 19.01, 19.02 and 19.03 of the
Pima County Code in their entirety;
adopting new Chapters 19.01, 19.02 and
19.03 of the Pima County Code,
establishing benefit areas and providing
for the assessment of development fees
to offset the capital costs for
construction of streets and roadways in
areas covered by the County's Capital
Improvement Plan and establishing the
amount of such development fees. (All
Districts)
Ben Goff, Deputy Director of
Transportation, stated that on March 18,
2003, the Board approved the increase
of Development Impact Fees for
residential uses and establish a fee for
non-residential uses. The Ordinance
before the Board contains the
recommended phased in fee increases
with the first phase taking affect
beginning July 1, 2003, and the second
phase being implemented on January 1,
2004. The annual increase will begin on
July 1, 2004, based on changes of the
consumer price index. Mr. Goff said
other recommendations include the
adoption of the three benefit area plans
for Avra Valley, Altar Valley and
Mountain View and changes to the list
of the Demonstration Fee Projects for
development fees. The benefit area
plans, along with a list of the projects
that are eligible for the expenditure of
fees, are contained in the ordinance.
Another recommendation was the
implementation of an administrative fee
for each lot to cover the administrative
costs of the program.
Charlie Bowles, representing Diamond
Ventures, Inc., stated he would like to
know how he and the public can stay
current with the Capital Improvement list
as it is modified?
Chuck Huckelberry, County
Administrator, stated the Capital
Improvement and Spending Program is
adopted every year at the time of the
final budget adoption.
Mr. Bowles requested that the
language of Section 18 be revised to
read: _The Development Fee Appeal
Panel shall continue to be in existence
for one year._ He also suggested that
there be a five year time limit inserted as
part of the language on Chapter
19.03.050, regarding Pima County's
recoupment for excessive capacity,
which states that Pima County can use
the Development Impact Fees collected
to repay the County for the capacity it
constructed with no time limit from the
time of construction and the issuance of
credits. He asked that the time limit of 5
years be added as part of the language
of Pima County's recouping of excess
capacity or remove the five year
limitation from the developer as it has
been removed from Pima County's
requirements.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the Code
Text Amendment and pass and adopt
Ordinance No. 2003- 40, with di rection
to staff to provide a report to the Board
regarding the Development Fee Appeals
Panel capacity, both specific and legal,
and the ramifications of their continued
existence.
ADDENDUM
30. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT:
PRETREATMENT SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
Staff recommends approval of the
following proposed pretreatment
settlement agreement, Wastewater
Management Enterprise Fund:
Guilin Restaurant, L.L.C., an Arizona
Lim ited Liability Corporation, No.
2002-03. Proposed settlement amount is
$14,416.88.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the Pretreatment
Settlement Agreement.
31. PROCLAMATION
Proclaiming the month of April 2003 to
be:
"SEXUAL ASSAULT AWARENESS
MONTH IN PIMA COUNTY"
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the
proclamation.
32. CALL TO THE PUBLIC
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard. No one appeared.
33. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further business to
come before the Board, the meeting was
adjourned at 12:07 p.m.
Sharon Bronson CHAIR ATTEST: Lori
Godoshian, CLERK
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
June 5, 2026
5min






MINUTES, FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT BOARD
APRIL 15, 2026
The Pima County Flood
Control District Board met in
Regular Session in the regular
meeting place of the Pima
County Board of Supervisors on
the First Floor of the
Administration Building of the
Governmental Center, Tucson,
Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on
Tuesday, April 15, 2003. Upon
roll call, those present and
absent were as follows:
Present: Sharon Bronson,
Chair
Richard Elias, Vice Chair
Ray Carroll, Member
Ann Day, Member
Dan Eckstrom, Member
Robin Brigode, Deputy Clerk
Absent: None
REGULAR AGENDA
1. AGREEMENT, CONTRACT
AND/OR AMENDMENT
Charles L. Phillips, Jr.,
Charles L. Phillips, Jr., as Sole
Trustee of the Charles L.
Phillips, Sr., Testamentary Trust
for the benefit of Charles L.
Phillips, Jr., and his issue, as to
an undivided 25% interest, Tim
Phillips, Wendy Berry,
Bernadette Phillips, and Colleen
T. Hepner as to an undivided
50% interest, to provide an
acquisition agreement for real
property located on the north and
south of Snyder Hill Road
approximately 3 miles west of
San Joaquin Road, is north of,
and adjoins the north boundary
of Ryan Field Airport, Tax Parcel
Nos. 209-03-001A, 211-34-0240
and 211-34-0450, under the
Floodprone Land Acquisition
Program, Flood Control Levy
Fund, contract amount not to
exceed $963,640.00 including
closing costs
(22-64-P-132154-0403) Real
Property
On consideration, it was
moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Carroll,
and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the
agreement, contract and/or
amendment.
2. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further
business to come before the
Board, the meeting was
adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
Sharon Bronson CHAIR
ATTEST: Lori Godoshian,
CLERK
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
June 5, 2026
5minfc






MINUTES, KINO COMMUNITY
HOSPITAL GOVERNING BOARD
APRIL 15, 2026
The Pima County Kino
Community Hospital Governing
Board met in regular session in
the regular meeting place of the
Pima County Board of
Supervisors on the First Floor of
the Administration Building of
the Governmental Center,
Tucson, Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on
Tuesday, April 15, 2003. Upon
roll call, those present and
absent were as follows:
Present: Sharon Bronson,
Chair
Richard Elias, Vice Chair
Ray Carroll, Member
Ann Day, Member
Dan Eckstrom, Member
Robin Brigode, Deputy Clerk
Absent: None
REGULAR AGENDA
1. AGREEMENTS,
CONTRACTS AND/OR
AMENDMENTS
A. Northern Arizona University,
Amendment No. 4, to provide a
physical therapy education
program and extend contract
term to 4/30/04, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, no cost
(01-06-N-126988-0100)
B. Chicago White Sox,
Amendment No. 1, to provide
hospital services and extend
contract term to 4/30/05, revenue
(18-06-C-130658-0202)
C. Arizona Physicians IPA,
Inc., Amendment No. 5, to
provide a managed care program
and extend contract term to
9/30/03, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $350,000.00
revenue (18-06-A-129862-1000)
D. Arizona Physicians IPA,
Inc., Amendment No. 6, to
provide a managed care program
and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, no cost
(18-06-A-129862-1000)
E. Presidio Surgical Group,
P.C., to provide general surgery
services, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount
$450,000.00
(18-06-P-132170-0303)
On consideration, it was
moved by Supervisor Elias,
seconded by Chair Bronson, and
unanimously carried by a five to
zero vote, to approve the
agreements, contracts and/or
amendments.
2. IFB
B. IFB 67719 Paper and
Plastic Supplies (Juvenile Court
Center/General Fund,
$25,000.00; Kino Community
Hospital/PHCS Enterprise Fund,
$10,000.00; Posada Del
Sol/PHCS Enterprise Fund,
$25,000.00; and Sheriff's
Detention Center/General Fund,
$123,091.78) Shamrock Foods
(Corporate Headquarters:
Phoenix, AZ) total contract
amount $183,091.78 including
sales tax.
On consideration, it was
moved by Supervisor Elias,
seconded by Chair Bronson, and
unanimously carried by a five to
zero vote, to approve IFB 67719.
3. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further
business to come before the
Board, the meeting was
adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
Sharon Bronson CHAIR
ATTEST: Lori Godoshian,
CLERK
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
June 5, 2026
5mink(a)





MINUTES, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEETING
APRIL 15, 2026
The Pima County Board of
Supervisors met in Regular Session at
the regular meeting place of the Pima
County Board of Supervisors on the First
Floor of the Administration Building of
the Governmental Center, Tucson,
Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, April
15, 2003. Upon roll call, those present
and absent were as follows:
Present: Sharon Bronson, Chair
Richard Elias; Vice Chair
Ray Carroll, Member
Ann Day, Member
Dan Eckstrom, Member
Robin Brigode, Deputy Clerk
Absent: None
REGULAR AGENDA
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
All present joined in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ADDENDUM I
2. PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATION
Presentation to the representative of
the Arizona ASLA proclaiming the week
of April 19 through April 27, 2003, to be:
"NATIONAL LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE WEEK"
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the
proclamation.
Supervisor Carroll presented the
proclamation to Lori Woods.
Lori Woods, President of the Arizona
Chapter of the American Society of
Landscape Architects, accepted the
proclamation on behalf of the landscape
architecture community.
REGULAR AGENDA
3. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The Board of Supervisors on February
18, 2003, continued the following to this
date:
Co8-02-04, RECREATION AREA IN
SUB DIVISION
Without objection, this item was
continued to the Board of Supervisors
regular meeting of June 17, 2003.
4. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
Co8-01-03, Co8-01-03 TUCSON
MOUNTAINS PROTECTED PEAKS AND
RIDGES (PEAK No. 38 IN AREA 1)
Without objection, this item was
removed from the agenda.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard on any item listed for
action on the Consent Calendar? No one
appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, that the
Consent Calendar be approved as
presented subject to the following:
PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENT, CON
TRACT AND/OR AMENDMENT
C. Carondelet Health Network,
Amendment No. 6, to provide hospital
services, extend contract term to
4/30/04 and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $3,500,000.00
(18-15-C-128370-1100) Pima Health
System
Supervisor Elias stated he pulled this
item because this was the sixth
amendment for a contract amount of
$3,500,000.00. He said he did not
believe items with this amount of money
should be on the Consent Calendar.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to approve
the agreement, contract and/or
amendment.
* * * *
PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY
SUPERVI SOR CARROLL:
PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENT, CON
TRACT AND/OR AMENDMENT
B-4. Waste Management, Amendment
No. 6, to provide refuse removal
services and extend contract term to
10/31/03, Various Department Funds,
contract amount $60,000.00
(11-13-W-126888-1199) Facilities
Management
Supervisor Carroll pulled this item and
asked for an explanation of this item
being a 6th amendment?
Mike Tuinstra, Facilities Management
Director, stated the amendment was
extended to October 31, 2003, in order to
allow the Facilities Management
Department time to seek new bids.
* * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE
AS FOLLOWS:
PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENTS,
CON TRACTS AND/OR AMENDMENTS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 72 ,
approv ing an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the Drexel Heights Fire
District, to provide installation of five fire
hydrants and reflective numbers for
home addressing in Valencia West
target area, CDBG Grant Fund, contract
amount $30,000.00
(01-39-D-132159-0403) Community
Services
* * * *
A-1. Arizona Department of Economic
Security, Community Services
Administration, Amendment No. 6, to
provide case management and
emergency services and amend scope
of work, State CSA Fund, contract
amount $220,600.00 revenue
(01-39-A-129382-0701) Community
Services
A-2. Arizona Department of Economic
Security, Amendment No. 2, to provide
for the Workforce Investment Act
Program, WIA Grant Fund, contract
amount $4,186.00 revenue
(01-39-A-131072-0402) Community
Services
A-3. Arizona Department of Economic
Security, Amendment No. 4, to provide
training, employment and related
support services and amend scope of
work, WIA Grant Fund, contract amount
$225,000.00 revenue
(01-39-A-129348-0401) Community
Services
A-4. Community Food Bank, Inc.,
Amendment No. 4, to provide for the
Amado Community Food Bank and
Recreational Center, extend contract
term to 10/31/03 and amend scope of
work, CDBG Grant Fund, contract
amount $30,000.00
(11-39-C-128487-1000) Community
Services
A-5. State of Arizona, Department of
Housing, Amendment No. 1, to provide
social services to low-income
population, extend contract term to
6/30/04 and amend scope of work,
Arizona State Department of Housing
Fund, contract amount $140,175.00
revenue (01-39-A-131051-0702)
Community Services
A-6. Open Inn, Inc., Amendment No. 1,
to provide transitional housing,
employment and training assistance
and amend scope of work, HUD-SHP
Fund, contract amount $11,635.00
(11-39-O-130941-0702) Community
Services
A-7. Our Town Family Centers, Inc.,
Amendment No. 1, to provide
transitional housing, employment and
training assistance and amend scope of
work, HUD-SHP Fund, contract amount
$16,356.00 (11-39-O-130936-0702)
Community Services
A-8. Family Counseling Agency,
Amendment No. 1, to provide transitional
housing, employment and training
assistance and amend scope of work,
HUD-SHP Fund, contract amount
$5,026.00 (11-39-F-130935-0702)
Community Services
A-9. City of South Tucson, Amendment
No. 1, to provide for the Las Artes
Mosaic Tile Mural Project, extend
contract term to 6/30/04 and amend
scope of work, City of South Tucson
Fund, contract amount $50,000.00
revenue (01-39-S-130833-0602)
Community Services
B. Arizona Print Copy, Inc., to provide
a lease agreement for space located at
18 E. Pennington Street, contract
amount $70,826.46 revenue
(04-13-A-132146-0503) Facilities
Management
B-1. Siemens Enterprise Networks,
L.L.C., Amendment No. 2, to provide
technical support for PBX telephone
equipment and software services,
extend contract term to 4/16/04 and
reflect name change to Siemens
Information and Communication
Networks, Inc., General Fund, contract
amount $43,000.00
(11-13-S-128942-0401) Facilities
Management
B-2. Twin Peaks Construction, Inc., of
Nevada, Amendment No. 3, to provide
for the Kino Community Hospital 5th
Floor Improvement Project and reflect
name change to Developers Builders
Management Company, Inc., d.b.a. BMC
Development, 1997 General Obligation
Bond Fund, no cost
(03-13-D-131744-1002) Facilities
Management
B-3. Twin Peaks Construction, Inc., of
Nevada, Amendment No. 1, to provide
for the Posada Del Sol Nursing Home
Dayroom and Courtyard Project and
reflect name change to Developers
Builders Management Company, Inc.,
d.b.a. BMC Development, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, no cost
(03-13-B-131743-1002) Facilities
Management
B-4. Waste Management, Amendment
No. 6, to provide refuse removal
services and extend contract term to
10/31/03, Various Department Funds,
contract amount $60,000.00
(11-13-W-126888-1199) Facilities
Management
C. Carondelet Health Network,
Amendment No. 6 (REMOVED FOR
SEPARATE ACTION)
C-1. Richard D. Dexter, D.O., to provide
primary care physician services, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, contract amount not to
exceed $100,000.00
(18-15-D-132171-0303) Pima Health
System
C-2. St. Elizabeth of Hungary Clinic, to
provide dental services, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, contract amount not to
exceed $75,000.00
(18-15-S-132174-0503) Pima Health
System
C-3. Arizona Community Physicians,
Amendment No. 5, to provide primary
care physician/ echocardiography
services and amend contractual
language, PHCS Enterprise Fund, no
cost (18-15-A-127342-0400) Pima Health
System
C-4. Radiology Limited, Amendment
No. 3, to provide radiology services and
add a new service site, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, no cost (18-15-R-129515-0801)
Pima Health System
C-5. Jacob C. Fruchthendler Jewish
Community Hospice, Amendment No. 3,
to provide hospice service, extend
contract term to 3/31/04 and amend
contractual language, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount $60,000.00
(07-15-J-127302-0300) Pima Health
System
C-6. Arcadia Health Care, Amendment
No. 5, to provide home health care
services, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
contract amount $570,000.00
(11-15-A-128169-0800) Pima Health
System
D. Pinal County Sheriff's Department,
Amendment No. 1, to provide for
participation in the Southwest Border
Alliance Program and extend contract
term to 6/30/03, H.I.D.T.A. XII Federal
Grant Fund, no cost
(01-11-P-130674-1001) Sheriff
D-1. Gary's Towing and Salvage Pool,
Inc., Amendment No. 1, to provide
towing services for private motorists and
extend contract term to 6/30/04, General
Fund, contract amount $25,500.00
(11-11-G-131368-0702) Sheriff
E. Mountain Power Electrical
Contractor, Inc., Amendment No. 2, to
provide as-needed electrical
construction services, Transportation
Bond Fund, contract amount
$140,000.00 (03-04-M-130385-0202)
Transportation
E-1. RS Engineering, Inc., Amendment
No. 2, to provide for the Country Club:
36th Street to Irvington Road
Improvement Project, extend contract
term to 3/31/04 and amend scope of
work, Capital Improvement Bond Fund,
no cost (16-04-R-127842-0300)
Transportation
F. Pima County Community College
District, to provide for the Wastewater
Operations Trainee Program/Cooperative
Agreement, no cost
(07-03-P-132177-0203) Wastewater
Management
RATIFICATION OF CHANGE ORDER
EX ECUTED PURSUANT TO PIMA
COUNTY CODE SECTION
11.16.010(C)(2)
Western Slope Utilities, Inc., Change
Order No. 1, to provide for the Santa
Cruz Central Interceptor Repair - Phase
1 Project, extend contract term to 4/4/03
and amend scope of work, WWM
Operating Fund, no cost
(03-03-W-132026-0303) Wastewater
Management
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Approval of the Board of Supervisors'
Meeting Schedule for the period of April
through August, 2003.
PROCUREMENT
IFB'S
A. 68586 Heating and Refrigeration
Supplies (Facilities
Management/General Fund) Primary
vendor: Johnstone Supply (Corporate
Headquarters: Tucson, AZ) $90,000.00
including2 sales tax; and secondary
vendor: Refrigeration Supplies
Distributor (Corporate Headquarters:
Lake Forest, CA) $30,000.00 including
sales tax.
B. 69665 Pavement Marking Tape
(Transportation/Transportation Operating
Fund) 3M Company (Corporate
Headquarters: St. Paul, MN)
$171,926.78 including sales tax.
C. 67719 Paper and Plastic Supplies
(Ju venile Court Center/General Fund,
$25,000.00; Kino Community
Hospital/PHCS Enterprise Fund,
$10,000.00; Posada Del Sol/PHCS
Enterprise Fund, $25,000.00; and
Sheriff's Detention Center/General
Fund, $123,091.78) Shamrock Foods
(Cor porate Headquarters: Phoenix, AZ)
total con tract amount $183,091.78
including sales tax.
BOARD, COMMISSION AND/OR
COMMITTEE
METROPOLITAN EDUCATION
COMMISSION
Appointment of Cathy Hunt, Disabled
Community Representative, to replace
Gaston Mascarenas. Term expiration:
12/31/05; Brandi Monique Felix, MEC
Youth Advisory Council/Tucson Teen
Congress Representative, to replace
Caitlin Hall. Term expiration: 12/31/05;
and Judith Bartley, Teacher, Grades
9-12 (AZ Education Association)
Representative, to replace Andrew
Morrill. Term expiration: 12/31/03.
(Committee Recommendations)
RECORDER
Pursuant to Resolution No. 1993-200,
ratification of the Document Storage and
Retrieval Fund for the month of February
2003.
TREASURER'S OFFICE - Certificates
of Clearance pursuant to A.R.S.
42-19118.
NAME OF OWNER REFERENCE NO.
TAX YEAR
Baize, Deborah Kay 00011036234
2000
02011037607 2002
01011017812 2001
Hernandez, Cruz or Myrna
99071000042 1999
00011035950 2000
01011017707 2001
02011037419 2002
Ibarra, Ricky or Sylvia 00011007104
2000
01011005021 2001
02011013829 2002
Kelly, Brett 01011018048 2001
Ordoz, Rodolfo 96011032870 1996
97011029667 1997
98011026304 1998
99011024134 1999
00011022594 2000
01021014452 2001
Ortiz, Ruben Armando 99011015686
1999
00011014883 2000
01021010727 2001
02011020459 2002
Rivera, Beta 00011035326 2000
99011019735 1999
01021020612 2001
02011037014 2002
Southwest Mobile Home Storage
02011037663 2002
Via Verde West 02011034664 2002
PUBLIC WORKS
REAL PROPERTY
A. QUIT CLAIM DEED
Quit Claim Deed to the City of South
Tucson, for a strip of land west of South
Tenth Avenue, south of West 32nd
Street, northeast of the former El Paso
and Southwestern Railroad right-of-way,
Section 24, T14S, R13E. No revenue.
(District 2)
B. WATER FRANCHISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 73 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona, authorizing a franchise granted
to Ray Water Company, Inc., for a water
distribution system in Sections 3, 4, 9
and 10 of T15S, R14E. No Revenue.
(District 2)
C. ABATEMENT OF REAL ESTATE
TAXES
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 74 ,
authorizing and directing the abatement
of real estate taxes accrued against
Pima County Flood Control District
property, Tax Parcel No. 221-07-0060,
Section 24, T12S, R12E. (District 3)
D. ABANDONMENT, QUIT CLAIM
DEED AND WARRANTY DEED
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 75 , of the
Pima County Board of Supervisors,
providing for the vacation by exchange
of a portion of West Speedway Road
lying within Section 5, T14S, R13E,
G&SRM, Pima County, Arizona. (District
5)
2. Quit Claim Deed to Robert Sherman,
as Trustee of Irrevocable Land Trust
dated August 30, 1990, Monroe J.
Sherman, Successor Trustee, for a
portion of West Speedway Road
established under Proceeding No. 209,
lying within Section 5 and 8, T14S,
R13E. No Revenue. (District 5)
3. Warranty Deed from Robert
Sherman, as Trustee of Irrevocable Land
Trust dated August 30, 1990, for a strip
of land south of the existing constructed
location of West Speedway Road lying
within Section 5, T14S, R13E. No cost.
(District 5)
PROCLAMATION
Proclaiming the week of April 21
through April 27, 2026 to be:
"NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOP
MENT WEEK"
RATIFY AND/OR APPROVE
Minutes: February 18 and March 4,
2003
6. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: REVI
SION TO PIMA COUNTY MERIT
SYSTEM, RULE 10
Staff requests approval of the changes
to Merit System Rule 10.1.D.2,
Probation.
Ray Figueroa, representing AFSME,
requested this item be continued
because AFSME should have been
notified regarding any change to the
Merit System Rules. AFSME was not
notified nor did they receive a copy of
the proposed change. He requested a
continuance until the information was
received by AFSME.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to continue this item to May
6, 2003.
7. PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENT,
CON TRACT AND/OR AMENDMENT
The Board of Supervisors on April 8,
2003, continued the following to this
date:
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood
Health Center, Inc., Amendment No. 4, to
provide dental, primary care physician,
specialty and obstetrical care services,
extend contract term to 3/31/04 and
amend contractual language, PHCS
Enterprise Fund, contract amount
$1,350,000.00 (18-15-E-128368-1100)
Pima Health System
The following speakers address the
Board in opposition of approval for this
amendment:
1. Linda Bohlke, AFSME; and,
2. Ray Figueroa, AFSME.
The provided the following reasons for
their opposition:
a. El Rio is a neighborhood health
center and, as such, it should be held to
a higher standard of accountability;
b. AFSME is currently involved in a
labor dispute with El Rio in which El Rio
announced their intention to remove 40
percent of their bargaining unit and
would not negotiate further until AFSME
agreed to that term;
c. AFSME questioned El Rio's
decision to do that because it was not
good faith bargaining;
d. El Rio's decision was not in the
best interest of the employees or the
community;
e. Those negotiation tactics being
used by El Rio amounted to union
busting and after the current contract
expires on May 31, 2003, those
employees would no longer be protected
under that contract; and,
f. AFSME asked the Board to continue
this item until El Rio came back to the
bargaining table.
Chuck Huckelberry, County
Administrator, stated this was a contract
between the County's HMO Plan and
Pima Health System (PHS) and El Rio.
The County entered into this contract to
fulfill part of the network requirements by
the State for the AHCCCS bid and to
retain qualifications for the AHCCCS
bid. Without approval of this
amendment, El Rio would be in violation
of the contract ceiling and the County
would not have the authority to
reimburse El Rio for services provided
to their clients. He recommended
approval of the contract amendment
because the County has no ability to
affect the contract due to AHCCCS rules
and regulations. There are currently
3,500 members receiving care through
El Rio which would cause a significant
problem if another provider had to be
found in the service area.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, to continue this item
for 30 days to allow AFSME and El Rio
time to negotiate and reach an
agreement.
The motion died for the lack of a
second.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, to approve the
agreement, contract and/or amendment.
No vote was taken at this time.
A substitute motion was made by
Supervisor Elias, to extend this contract
for a period of two months. In the event
the two month period is not sufficient
time, the contract would be extended
again while negotiations continue.
The motion died for the lack of a
second.
Upon the vote being taken on the
original motion, it was carried by a four
to one vote, Supervisor Elias voting
"Nay," to approve the agreement,
contract and/or amendment.
8. PROCUREMENT: QUARTERLY RE
PORT ON CONTRACTS
Pursuant to Pima County Code
Section 11.08.010, staff submits the first
quarterly report on contracts awarded
1/1/03 to 3/31/03 and asks for direction
on future reports.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and carried by a four
to zero vote, Supervisor Elias voting
"Nay," to approve the quarterly report on
contracts.
9. PROCUREMENT/FACILITIES MAN
AGEMENT: CANCELLATION AND
RE-AWARD OF CONTRACT
A. Cancellation of award made on
December 9, 2002, to American
Environmental Services, L.L.C. for
landscape maintenance.
B. Award of contract for landscape
maintenance to second low bidder
Northcott, Bellow and Associates, d.b.a.
Palo Verde Landscape and
Maintenance (Corporate Headquarters:
Tucson, AZ) in the amount of
$61,400.00. Capital Improvement Fund.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and carried by a four
to zero vote, Supervisor Elias voting
"Nay," to approve the cancellation and
re-award of contract.
10. PROCUREMENT: REQUISITION
NO. 65795
Pursuant to Pima County Code
Section 11.24.010, the Health
Department requests approval to use
Arizona State Contract AD0200018 for
Requisition No. 65795, 1 Tandberg 2500
and 2 Tandberg 6000 video
conferencing systems. Staff
recommends Wire One Technologies
(Corporate Headquarters: Scottsdale,
AZ) contract amount $104,437.24
including sales tax, Federal Grant Fund.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and carried by a four
to zero vote, Supervisor Elias voting
"Nay," to approve Requisition No.65795.
11. PROCUREMENT: CANCELLATION
OF RFP
Staff requests cancellation of RFP No.
1256-02, Self-Funded Health Benefits
and rejection of all proposals received.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and carried by a four
to zero vote, Supervisor Elias voting
"Nay," to approve the cancellation of
RFP No. 1256-02.
12. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
PLAT NOTE MODIFICATION
Co12-86-85, AGUA DULCE (LOT 16)
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this was a plat note
modification for Lot 16 of the Agua
Dulce Subdivision. This property is SR
zoned for 3.61 acres and the property
owner requested an equal exchange of
natural open space for buildable area.
Staff recommended approval subject to
conditions. There would be a net gain of
approximately 3,354 feet of natural open
space if this request was approved. One
letter of protest was received.
Chair Bronson indicated she had a
letter dated April 14, 2003, from Debbie
Hecht, President of the Tucson
Mountain Association. She also had a
letter of opposition from Ann Burdette
and Louise Anderson.
David Lechner, Lechner Construction
representing the applicant, stated upon
inception of this project the buildable
site envelope was inside a wash. The
applicant wants to move the existing
buildable area approximately 100 feet
onto a more level site out of the existing
wash and floodplain.
Supervisor Elias stated this was the
first time he had ever heard this
argument.
Mr. Lechner explained 10 to 15
percent of the buildable area was not
located in the wash area which was not
adequate space to build a home. The
existing buildable area was 1,000 to
1,500 square feet.
The following speakers addressed the
Board in opposition to the proposed
change:
1. Bram Goldman, retired judge and
area resident;
2. Edward Strauch, area resident.
They provided the following reasons
for their opposition:
a. The map received from County staff
was reduced so much that the numbers
for the lots or parcels were not easily
discernible;
b. Area residents met with County
staff, had meetings, numerous phone
calls were made and they did not have
time to complete their investigation;
c. This area was a cluster zone
approved by the County many years ago
in which a buffer was provided so that
neighbors would be protected from the
area to be developed;
d. The buffer area provides a bypass
from the paved area for wildlife to natural
open space;
e. Neighbors believed the issue was
settled with the decision of a previous
Board so they requested a denial of this
request and adoption of a policy to
prevent incursion into natural open
space; and,
f. Neighbors successfully fought
against the installation of sewer pipes in
the wash years ago and gained a
setback as the result of that fight.
Chair Bronson suggested because the
entire issue was not clear and
understood by area residents or the
Board members, a continuance of this
item would be appropriate. Staff is to
work with area residents who turned in
speaker cards and the Board for a better
understanding of the request.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by Chair
Bronson, and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to continue this item to
the Board of Supervisors regular meeting
of May 6, 2003.
ADDENDUM I
13. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR:
HEALTH BENEFITS
Health Benefits - Premium Sharing
Proposal. Discussion/Direction/Action.
Chuck Huckelberry, County
Administrator, outlined the options open
to the Board for approval as Plan A, Plan
B and Plan C. Plan A is the existing
HMO with the high premiums of the two
existing health care providers at a 7.7
million dollar increase. Plan B is the
PPO Plan and the smallest increase
closest to existing rates, but this plan
carries a high risk of deductibility
particularly in hospitalization charges,
and Plan C is the option of having
Pacificare as the sole source provider
which would increase the premiums. The
sole source option would cost the
County 4 million dollars plus. Two
options of premium sharing were
explored and one was simply a flat
premium share per pay period that would
be paid by all participants at a cost of
$10.00 per pay period. Another option
that was discounted was the concept of
spreading the cost proportionate to
utilization at $5.00 per pay period per
enrolled recipient. The utilization cost
would have unloaded some of the cost
from the employee only plan but it would
then place it back to the family or the
family and spouse that would cause
hardship. Some of the debates and
questions have led to the misconception
that the County could have gotten a
better bid had the County asked Blue
Cross/Blue Shield to submit a proposal,
however, a letter dated March 20, 2003,
from the Chief Executive Officer of Blue
Cross/Blue Shield indicated the
County's current rates were better than
anything they could provide at this time.
The following individuals addressed
the Board to express their concerns
regarding the proposed health care
coverage:
1. Ray Figueroa, AFSME;
2. Lt. Mike Sacco, Sheriff's
Department;
3. Ren Redmond, County employee;
4. Linda Bohlke, AFSME;
5. Lt. John Savary, Corrections
Lieutenant/Sheriff's Department;
6. Sgt. Brad Foust, Sheriff's
Department; and,
7. Clint Whittaker, Corrections
Sergeant/Sheriff's Department.
Their concerns about health care
coverage are as follows:
a. City of Tucson employees did not
receive wage increases this year, but
the City absorbed the increased costs of
health care;
b. Employees will pay more in
out-of-pocket expenses for their health
care coverage especially for family and
spouse coverage;
c. Employees preferred to retain the
current HMO plan with its lower
out-of-pocket expenses;
d. The proposed rate increases will be
devastating for those who can least
afford it;
e. The proposed rate increase amounts
to approximately a 1.5 percent decrease
in those employees paychecks;
f. The salary paid to support staff is
barely enough to make ends meet with
the additional costs incurred just for
working for Pima County, i.e. parking
expenses;
g. Health care is a national crisis and
the AFSME representatives asked the
Board to join them in calling for a
Universal Health Care System;
h. Increased health care costs will
force many families to make choices
between feeding their families or buying
their prescriptions, a choice they should
not have to make;
i. Sole source looks good on paper,
however, when the State of Arizona went
sole source with Cigna their premiums
increased and copays tripled;
j. The County would be at the mercy of
the health carrier in a sole source
contract;
k. The County was urged to negotiate
with Pacificare and attempt to decrease
costs for employees even further;
l. Comparisons with smaller Counties
in Arizona were examined and it was
discovered the smaller Counties pay
double what Pima County pays for
employee health coverage; and,
m. Increased health benefits would
impact the County's ability to retain
trained employees.
Chair Bronson asked what would
happen to the employees who are
currently with HealthNet who have a
pre-existing condition and they are
transferred to Pacificare? Will Pacificare
take them?
Mr. Huckelberry explained that most
physicians provide care for their
patients under contract to both
HealthNet and Pacificare so it would be
fairly easy for those employees to
transition to Pacificare and continue
their care with their primary care
physician. In the event an employee or
dependent has a pre-existing condition
and is under specialty care and they
experience problems continuing that
care, they are referred to the Pima
County Benefits Coordinator to assist in
taking care of the problem.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by
Supervisor Elias, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to
implement the health plan for a sole
provider and leave open premium
sharing and investigate premium
sharing options; furthermore, direct the
County Administrator to explore other
governments regarding the amounts
their employees pay for families and
children.
14. RECESS
Without objection, the Chair declared
a closed captionist recess at 10:45 a.m.
15. RECONVENE
The Board of Supervisors meeting
reconvened at 11:05 a.m. All members
were present.
16. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING CLOSURE
Co9-92-26, COLLINS - COLOSSAL
CAVE ROAD NO. 2 REZONING
Proposal to close Co9-92-26, a
rezoning from RH (Rural Homestead) to
CB-1 (Local Business) of 3.64 acres
located on the west side of Colossal
Cave Road, directly south of the
Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. The
rezoning was approved in 1993 and
expired on March 19, 2003. Staff
recommends AGAINST CLOSURE.
(District 4)
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this is a 3.64 acres property
that was rezoned in 1993 from RH to
CB-1. Staff recommended against
closure to allow the petitioner time to
apply for an extension.
Casey Stockdale, representative for
the buyers, supported staff's
recommendation and was present to
answer any questions.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to address the Board in
opposition? No one appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by
Supervisor Day, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to close
the public hearing and accept staff's
recommendation against closure of
Co9-92-26.
17. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
FINAL PLAT
P1202-055, Co9-80-15, Plaza Serena,
Lots 1-8 and Common Areas A and B.
(District 1)
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to approve the final plat.
18. BOARD, COMMISSION AND/OR
COMMITTEE
The Board of Supervisors on March
18, 2003, continued the following to this
date:
ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 31 , of the
Board of Supervisors of Pima County,
Arizona; relating to Wastewater;
amending Ordinance No. 1989-157,
Wastewater Management Advisory
Committee.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to address the Board? No one
appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Carroll, seconded by
Supervisor Elias, to close the public
hearing and to not amend the ordinance
but to leave the Commission as it
currently exists for Wastewater
Management.
No vote was taken at this time.
Kathleen Chavez, Wastewater
Management Director, suggested
amending the ordinance to eliminate the
Southern Arizona Water Resources, an
organization that no longer exists.
Supervisor Carroll amended his
motion, seconded by Supervisor Elias,
to close the public hearing and leave
the ordinance as it currently exists but
eliminate the Southern Arizona Water
Resources category.
19. FRANCHISE/LICENSE/PERMIT: LI
QUOR LICENSE
03-10-8687, Kwan Fun Cheung, d.b.a.
New China Super Buffet, 3000 W. Ina
Road, Series 12, Restaurant License,
New License.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard? No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearing, and
approve the liquor license and forward
the recommendation to the State Liquor
Control Board subject to the applicant
satisfying requirements of Chapter 18.97
in accordance with Section 18.43.03OG
of Pima County Code with a Type I
Conditional Use Permit.
20. FRANCHISE/LICENSE/PERMIT: LI
QUOR LICENSE
03-11-8688, Herman Gee, d.b.a.
Phoenix Village Restaurant, 2750 W.
Valencia Road, Series 07, Beer and
Wine Bar License, Person Transfer.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard? No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearing, and
approve the liquor license and forward
the recommendation to the State Liquor
Control Board.
21. FRANCHISE/LICENSE/PERMIT:
FIREWORKS PERMIT
Alan Michaels, d.b.a. The Centurions,
11300 S. Houghton Road, May 10, 2026
at approximately 9:30 p.m.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard. No one appeared. It
was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson,
seconded by Supervisor Elias, and
unanimously carried by a five to zero
vote, to close the public hearing and
approve the request.
22. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENT
The Board of Supervisors on August 6,
2002, September 17, 2002, October 15,
2002, November 19, 2002, January 21,
2003, February 4, 2003, February 18,
2003, and March 11, 2003, continued the
following to this date:
Co9-02-14, DOMINO - RUDASILL
ROAD REZONING (ZONING PLAN)
Request of George and Valerie
Domino, represented by Vinny
Yackanin, for a rezon ing of 7.59 acres
from SR (Suburban Ranch) to CR-1
(Single Residence) located on the south
side of Rudasill Road, approximately
1,000 feet west of Sabino Canyon Road.
The proposed rezoning conforms to the
Catalina Foothills Zoning Plan,
Co13-59-4 and the Pima County
Comprehensive Plan, Co7-00-20. On
motion, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioners
Membrila, Poulos and Williams were
absent) to recommend APPROVAL
WITH CONDI TIONS. Staff recommends
APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS and
standard and spe cial requirements.
(District 1)
"IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO
APPROVE THE REZONING, THE
FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL
REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED:
1. Submittal of a development plan if
determined necessary by the appropriate
County agencies.
2. Recording of a covenant holding
Pima County harmless in the event of
flooding.
3. Recording of the necessary
development related covenants as
determined appropriate by the various
County agencies.
4. Provision of development related
assurances as required by the
appropriate agencies.
5. Prior to the preparation of the
development related covenants and any
required dedication, a title report (current
to within 60 days) evidencing ownership
of the property shall be submitted to the
Department of Transportation, Real
Property Division.
6. Transportation conditions:
A. Any common, private,
road/driveway serving more than one
dwelling unit shall be paved (chip
sealed) within six (6) months of the
issuance of building permits.
B. The property owner(s) shall accept
responsibility for the maintenance,
control, safety and liability of privately
owned roads, parking areas, drives,
physical barriers, drainageways and
drainage easements.
C. Property owner(s) shall provide any
nec essary improvements to Rudasill
Road, as determined necessary by the
Department of Transportation, prior to the
issuance of building permits for any
portion of the property.
D. Access on Rudasill Road will be
limited to the existing
driveway/easement located along the
east rezoning boundary and to one
additional proposed access point, which
will need approval by Department of
Transportation prior to issuance of any
building permits for any portion of the
property.
7. Flood Control condition:
Drainage will not be altered, disturbed
or obstructed without the written approval
of the Flood Control District.
Post-development peak discharges from
the site shall not exceed
pre-development values.
8. Department of Environmental
Quality condition:
All proposed residential lots must
have a minimum area of 43,560 square
feet. A maximum of one-half of adjacent
rights-of-way or easements may be used
in the calculation of the area. The
adjacent rights-of-way or easements
must be suitable to absorb effluent; and
all other design requirements must be
satisfied.
9. Prior to ground modifying activities,
an on-the-ground archaeological and
historic sites survey shall be conducted
on the subject property. A cultural
resources mitigation plan for any
identified archaeological and historic
sites on the subject property shall be
submitted at the time of, or prior to, the
submittal of any tentative plan or
development plan. All work shall be
conducted by an archaeologist
permitted by the Arizona State Museum,
or a registered architect, as appropriate.
Following rezoning approval, any
subsequent development requiring a
Type II grading permit will be reviewed
for compliance with Pima County's
cultural resources requirements under
Chapter 18.81 of the Pima County
Zoning Code.
10. Adherence to the sketch plan as
approved at public hearing.
11. The site is limited to five lots and
one residence on each lot.
12. Utility services to individual
residences shall be underground.
13. Building heights are restricted to a
maximum of 24 feet.
14. The site shall be surveyed for the
presence or absence of the cactus
ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified
biological consultant who has a permit
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), unless USFWS determines a
survey is not required.
15. The property owner(s) shall provide
pedestrian access along Sabino
Shadow Lane easement."
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this waiver of platting
requirement was in the Catalina
Foothills Zoning Plan on 7.59 acres to
allow five lots. The Planning and Zoning
Commission and staff recommended
approval. This item was continued eight
times to allow the applicant time to work
out issues related to access
easements. All access to the property
would have to be approved by the
Department of Transportation per special
Condition No. 6D.
Vinny Yackanin, representative for the
property owners, said the property would
have five large lots with one home on
2.5 acres and the four additional lots
would be 1.25 acre lots. They requested
that Condition No. 15 be stricken due to
liability issues and the uncertainty
whether they had a right to open the
fence along Canyon View Elementary
School for pedestrian access.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by Chair
Bronson, to close the public hearing and
approve Co9-02-14, subject to
conditions and standard and special
requirements.
No vote was taken at this time.
Supervisor Elias asked staff to
comment on the request to strike
Condition 15.
Mr. Mazzocco explained that he
believed when the Planning and Zoning
Commission added that condition they
were looking at the hearing notification
map. The flatness of the map makes it
appear there may be potential for a
pedestrian easement, and they were not
aware of the actual site constraints the
property owner would have to deal with
when they made that condition.
Supervisor Day as the maker of the
motion and Chair Bronson as the
second, amended the motion to close
the public hearing, approve Co9-02-14,
subject to conditions, standard and
special requirements including that
Condition No. 15 be stricken.
23. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: COM
PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
The Board of Supervisors on
December 17, 2002, January 21, 2003,
and February 19, 2003, continued the
following to this date:
Co7-02-09, COMMERCIAL LAND
INVES TORS III - N. THORNYDALE
ROAD (Initiated by the Planning and
Zoning Commission on January 30,
2002)
Request of Commercial Land
Investors III, represented by Doug
Wright, to amend the Pima County
Comprehensive Plan from Low Intensity
Urban 0.3 (LIU 0.3) to Community
Activity Center (CAC). The subject
property is approximately 4.4 acres and
is located on the east side of N.
Thornydale Road, approximately 600
feet north of Cortaro Farms Road in the
Northwest Subregion. On motion, the
Planning and Zoning Commission voted
5-2 ( Commissioners Smith and
Spendiarian voted NAY; Commissioners
Membrila and RedDog were absent) to
recommend DENIAL. Staff recommends
DENIAL. (District 3)
Ben Changakoti, Principal Planner,
reported this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment was initiated by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. The
change would amend approximately 4.4
acres from LIU-0.3 to CAC that lies
within the multiple use Recovery
Management Area of the Conservation
Land System (CLS) within critical
pygmy owl habitat and is currently
zoned SR. The Planning and Zoning
Commission and Planning staff
recommended denial because this
general area is the focus of many
habitat issues. Planning staff believes it
would be premature to consider
increasing the intensity of land use
designations in this area until wildlife
issues have been resolved. Four
individuals spoke in opposition and
staff received three comment forms and
six letters in opposition as well as one
letter of support.
Douglas Wright, Managing General
Partner for Commercial Land Investors
III, provided his views as to why this
request should be approved. He
described the surrounding properties
which contained commercial and, since
the road improvements were completed,
he felt this parcel of land was ready for
commercial development.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to close the public hearing
and deny Co7-02-09.
24. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The Board of Supervisors on February
18, 2003, continued the following to this
date:
Co8-02-08, COMMERCIAL DESIGN
MANUAL, MINOR REVISIONS TO
GENERAL COMMERCIAL STANDARDS
AND PARKING STANDARDS
An ordinance of the Pima County
Board of Supervisors, relating to zoning;
amending Chapter 18.39 (General
Commercial Standards) and Chapter
18.75 (Off-Street Parking and Loading
Standards). On motion, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 8-0
(Commissioner Smith was absent) to
recommend MODIFIED APPROVAL.
Staff recom mends APPROVAL. (All
Districts)
If approved, pass and adopt:
ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 32
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this is a Zoning Code Text
Amendment that allows for a
Commercial Design Manual to go along
with the General Commercial Standards.
A memorandum dated April 14, 2003,
was forwarded to the Board containing
updated language and it was
recommended that the Board approve
this item subject to the memorandum.
Staff worked with an ad hoc committee
of neighborhood residents and
developers in creating both the manual
and text amendment. The following is
the language recommended for adoption:
"Section 18.39.030C4 Noise has the
adopted language from Ordinance
2001-165 and Section C5 contains the
reorganized noise plan option.
4. Noise: When the large scale retail
establishment is adjacent to an existing
residential use, the following noise
restrictions shall apply:
a. Deliveries, loading, idling, or similar
operations shall not occur between
10:00 pm and 6:00 am, unless the
activity occurs within a loading bay or
on the street side of the building; and
b. Trash removal or compaction, or
similar operations, shall not be allowed
between 7:00 pm and 7:00 am.
5. Exceptions: To the extent that the
pro posed development does not meet
the standards contained in this section
18.39.030C3g and 4a,b and b c, then a
noise plan shall be required to evaluate
the potential noise impacts in context
with the surrounding ambient noise
characteristics and shall specify how
noise generated by the proposed
development use will be mitigated. The
noise plan shall be developed using in
compliance with the Commercial
dDesign mManual guide lines. The
noise plan shall at a minimum provide
that the maximum noise level measured
at any adjoining residential property line
shall not exceed the greater of the
existing ambient noise level, or 65 dBA
from 6 am to 10 pm and 55 dBA from 10
pm to 6 am;
Noise plan option. To the extent that
the proposed development does not
meet the applicable development
standards contained in Section
18.39.030C2a (exposed loading area),
3g (loading area wall height), 4a (hours
of deliveries) and 4b (hours of trash
removal and compaction), then a noise
plan shall be prepared to evaluate the
potential noise impacts in context with
the surrounding ambient noise
characteristics and shall specify how
the proposed development will mitigate
noise generation. The required setback
for a loading or delivery bay and trash
removal or compaction enclosure shall
be at a minimum of 100 feet.
a. Noise level restrictions of the noise
plan shall not exceed the following
decibel (dB) limits as measured at any
adjoining residential property line of the
property receiving the sound based on
the reference sound pressure and
measured with a sound level meter:
1) Large scale retail and shopping
center adjacent to residential use:
Daytime (6am to 10 pm) 65 dB,
Nighttime (10 pm to 6 am) 45 dB; and
2) Office/commercial use adjacent to
resi dential use; and Daytime (6am to 10
pm) 65 dB, Nighttime (10 pm to 6 am) 45
dB;
3) Large scale retail and shopping
center adjacent to office/commercial
use; Daytime (6am to 10 pm) 75 dB,
Nighttime; not applicable.
b. A noise plan must be prepared and
im plemented to address all noise
including but not limited to the noise
resulting from loading and unloading of
trucks, dynamic vehicle braking
devices, truck waiting/idling, motor
vehicle sound amplification equipment,
warning devices (i.e. backup alarms),
store paging, music systems,
mechanical equipment, air-conditioning
units, loading and unloading areas,
garbage/dumpster/trash compactor and
fork lift operations. The noise plan shall
be prepared in compliance with the
Commercial Design Manual.
SECTION 2: Chapter 18.75 is hereby
amended by deleting Diagram 18.75.040
in its entirety.
SECTION 3: Chapter 18.99, Section
18.99.030, subsection H3a is hereby
amended to read as follows:
The decision of the committee may be
appealed to the Board of Supervisors
within 20 days of the committee's
decision by the applicant or any
property owner within 300 feet.
SECTION 4: Section 18.39.030A.1,
adopted by Section 1 of this ordinance
does not apply to a development plan
submitted prior the adoption of this
ordinance and approved within one year
after submittal."
Supervisor Carroll asked whether
approval of this ordinance would impact
roadway projects?
Mr. Mazzocco responded no, this item
had to do with how buildings and
parking lots are designed.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Day, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to close the public hearing;
to pass and adopt Ordinance No. 2003 -
32 , subject to the lan guage contained
in the April 14, 2003, memorandum.
25. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: AP
PEAL OF HEARING OFFICER
DECISION
The Board of Supervisors on April 1,
2003, continued the following to this
date:
P02ZV00309 - 2 and 4, SCOTT
MILLER AND CATHERINE
HERNANDEZ MILLER
In accordance with Pima County
Zoning Code Section 18.95.030D,
Michael S. Woodlock, Attorney, appeals
the decision of the Hearing Officer in
Case Nos. P02ZV00309, 2 and 4, on
property located at 16121 S. Delgado
Road, regarding violations to Section
18.01.030E.1, structures without
permits; and Section 18.14.030,
violation of home occupation
standard/permit conditions. (District 2)
Tom Hudson, Senior Planner,
described the violations of Scott Miller
and Catherine Hernandez Miller and the
dates of those violations. At the final
hearing for the violations, the appellants
were charged $750.00 for each violation
that included open storage, structures
without permits and structures not
meeting setback standards with $50.00
due immediately and the balance
suspended for 60 days in order to allow
time for the appellants to achieve
compliance. A fine in the amount of
$3,000.00 was assessed for the
violation of home occupation standards
with $100.00 due immediately and the
balance suspended for 60 days to allow
the appellants time for the removal of
commercial vehicles. In addition, the
fine would remain suspended for a
period of one year provided the property
remain in compliance. Staff
recommended the Hearing Officer's
decision be upheld.
Michael Woodlock, Attorney
representing the appellants, stated
since the violations occurred the
appellants have taken steps to reach
compliance. They have taken the
necessary steps to obtain permits on
some of those unpermitted structures
and have retained the services of
architects to draw the plans that are
necessary to obtain those permits. In
addition, they are seeking a permit to
build a carport that would house four
limousines and soon plan to apply for a
variance that would allow more than one
commercial vehicle on the property. The
appellants provide transportation
services to the elderly of Green Valley
which was why more than one vehicle
was needed. He requested the Board
extend the compliance date and fines
for an additional 30 days for a total of 90
days to allow time to obtain permits and
there is a ruling on the variance.
Mr. Hudson stated the additional 30
days was acceptable.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by
Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried
by a five to zero vote, to close the
hearing and hold in abeyance the
decision of the Hearing Officer and grant
the appellant an additional 30 days for a
total of 90 days to reach compliance.
26. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING
Co9-02-27, TEMUNOVIC - WETMORE
ROAD REZONING
Request of Petar and Cujeta
Temunovic, represented by Planning
Resources, for a rezoning of 2.2 acres
from SH (Suburban Homestead) to CB-2
(General Business) located on the south
side of Wetmore Road, approximately
400 feet east of Fairview Avenue. The
proposed rezoning conforms to the Pima
County Comprehensive Plan,
Co7-00-20. On motion, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 8-0
(Commissioner Smith was absent) to
recommend APPROVAL WITH
CONDITIONS. Staff recommends AP
PROVAL WITH CONDITIONS and
standard and special requirements.
(District 3)
"IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO
APPROVE THE REZONING, THE
FOLLOWING STANDARD AND
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED:
Completion of the following
requirements within five years from the
date of rezoning approval by the Board
of Supervisors:
1. Submittal of a development plan if
determined necessary by the
appropriate County agencies.
2. Recording of a covenant holding
Pima County harmless in the event of
flooding.
3. Recording of the necessary
development related covenants as
determined appropriate by the various
County agencies.
4. Provision of development related
assurances as required by the
appropriate agencies.
5. Prior to the preparation of the
develop ment related covenants and
any required dedication, a title report
(current to within 60 days) evidencing
ownership of the property shall be
submitted to the Public Works
Department, Real Property Services.
6. There shall be no further lot splitting
or subdividing without the written
approval of the Board of Supervisors.
7. Transportation conditions:
A. Access on Wetmore Road shall be
approved by Department of
Transportation.
B. The property owner(s) shall provide
any necessary access improvements to
Wetmore Road, as determined
necessary during the development
review process.
C. Internal access shall be provided
from the property, to the east and west,
due to the limited frontage of parcels in
the immediate area.
D. The property owner(s) shall provide
financial contribution towards the
Wetmore Road improvements, prior to
the issuance of any building permits for
any portion of the property.
E. The property owner(s) shall accept
responsibility for the maintenance,
control, safety and liability of privately
owned roads, parking areas, drives,
physical barriers, drainageways and
drainage easements.
8. Flood Control conditions:
A. Drainage shall not be altered,
disturbed or obstructed without the
written approval of the Flood Control
District.
B. The property owner(s) shall provide
fi nancial contribution to Pima County for
drainage improvements in the immediate
area, prior to the issuance of any
building permits for any portion of the
property.
C. The property owner(s) shall provide
all necessary drainage related
improvements that are needed as a
result of the proposed development both
on-site and off-site of the subject
property. The location, design and
construction of said improvements shall
be subject to the approval of the Flood
Control District.
D. The property owner shall comply
with retention/detention conditions and
restrictions as stated in the Floodplain
Management Ordinance since the
property lies within a balanced or critical
basin.
E. The property owner(s) shall accept
re sponsibility for the maintenance,
control, safety and liability of privately
owned roads, parking areas, drives,
physical barriers, drainageways and
drainage easements.
8. Flood Control conditions:
A. Drainage shall not be altered,
disturbed or obstructed without the
written approval of the Flood Control
District.
B. The property owner(s) shall provide
financial contribution to Pima County for
drainage improvements in the immediate
area, prior to the issuance of any
building permits for any portion of the
property.
C. The property owner(s) shall provide
all necessary drainage related
improvements that are needed as a
result of the proposed development both
on-site and off-site of the subject
property. The location, design and
construction of said improvements shall
be subject to the approval of the Flood
Control District.
D. The property owner(s) shall comply
with retention/detention conditions and
restrictions as stated in the Floodplain
Management Ordinance since the
property lies within a balanced or critical
basin.
9. Wastewater Management condition:
The property owner must connect to
the public sewer system at the location
and in the manner specified by
Wastewater Management at the time of
review of the tentative plat, development
plan or request for building permit.
10. Adherence to the preliminary
development plan as approved at public
hearing. Uses are restricted to the sale,
rental or display of automobiles.
11. There shall be a minimum
25-foot-wide buffer yard "D" along the
eastern and southern boundaries. The
retention/detention basin shall be
located along the southern boundary as
shown on the preliminary development
plan; and the combined width of the
southern bufferyard and the
retention/detention basin shall be a
minimum of 60 feet. The
retention/detention basin shall be
landscaped and shall not be used for
vehicular parking or storage of any type.
The eastern and southern bufferyard
requirements shall include a minimum
15-gallon canopy tree planted every 15
feet along the property lines. The
eastern bufferyard shall include a
minimum 40-inch-high decorative
masonry wall. Canopy trees within the
parking/display area shall be planted in
ratios and distributions as shown on the
preliminary development plan or per
code, whichever is more restrictive. The
25- foot bufferyard and wall element
along the eastern boundary shall not be
required if a bufferyard is not required by
code at the time of development plan
approval for the subject site. Additional
parking display area would then be
allowed within the 25-foot eastern
bufferyard area.
12. There shall be no use of outdoor
audio amplification.
13. Freestanding signage shall be
limited to one monument sign.
14. Outdoor lighting shall be hooded
and controlled such that the source of
light is not directed off-site."
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this was a rezoning from SH to
CB-2 on 2.2 acres for an auto, rental and
sales lot. Planning staff and the
Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval. There was no
protest or public comment.
The Chair inquired whether anyone in
opposition wished to address the
Board? No one appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to close the public hearing
and approve Co9-02-27, subject to
conditions and standard and special
requirements.
27. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
REZON ING
Co9-02-17, SAHUARITA 118 -
SAHUARITA ROAD REZONING
Request of Sahuarita 118, represented
by Flores Las Sahuarita, L.L.C., for a
rezoning of 87.3 acres from RH (Rural
Homestead) to GR-1 (Rural Residential)
located on the north side of Sahuarita
Road approximately 8,000 feet east of
Nogales Highway. The proposed
rezoning conforms to the Pima County
Comprehensive Plan, Co7-00-20. On
motion, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 8-0 (Commissioner
Smith was absent) to recommend
APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. Staff
recommends APPROVAL WITH CON
DITIONS and standard and special
require ments. (District 2)
"IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO
APPROVE THE REZONING, THE
FOLLOWING STANDARD AND
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED:
Completion of the following
requirements within five years from the
date of rezoning approval by the Board
of Supervisors:
1. Submittal of a development plan if
determined necessary by the
appropriate County agencies.
2. Recording of a covenant holding
Pima County harmless in the event of
flooding.
3. Recording of the necessary
development related covenants as
determined appropriate by the various
County agencies.
4. Provision of development related
assurances as required by the
appropriate agencies.
5. Prior to the preparation of the
development related covenants and any
required dedication, a title report (current
to within 60 days) evidencing ownership
of the property shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Real Property
Services.
6. There shall be no further lot splitting
or subdividing without the written
approval of the Board of Supervisors.
7. Transportation conditions:
A. The property owner(s) shall
dedicate additional right-of-way to Pima
County for 150 feet north half
right-of-way of Sahuarita Road.
B. The east 60 feet of the subject
rezoning shall remain as right-of-way.
The property owner shall construct a
roadway built to Pima County standards
from Sahuarita Road to Sahuarita Park
Road as agreed per the applicant and
Pima County Natural Resources, Parks
and Recreation Department. A multi- use
path shall be provided with a 20-foot
separation from the roadway and shall
include multiple pedestrian-oriented
access points. The path shall be
located on the east side of the property,
west of the roadway and within the
60-foot right-of-way.
C. The property owner(s) shall provide
any necessary improvements to
Sahuarita Road as determined
necessary during the development
review process.
8. Flood Control conditions:
A. Drainage shall not be altered,
disturbed or obstructed without the
written approval of the Flood Control
District.
B. The property owner(s) shall provide
all necessary drainage related
improvements that are needed as a
result of the proposed development both
on-site and off-site of the subject
property. The location, design and
construction of said improvements shall
be subject to the approval of the Flood
Control District.
9. Environmental Quality condition:
All proposed residential lots must
have a minimum area of 43,560 square
feet. A maximum of one-half of adjacent
rights-of-way or easements may be used
in the calculation of the area. The
adjacent rights-of way or easements
must be suitable to absorb effluent; and
all other design requirements must be
satisfied.
10. Cultural Resources and Historic
Preservation condition:
Prior to ground modifying activities, an
on-the-ground archaeological and
historic sites survey shall be conducted
on the subject property. A cultural
resources mitigation plan for any
identified archaeological and historic
sites on the subject property shall be
submitted at the time of, or prior to the
submittal of any tentative plan or
development plan. All work shall be
conducted by an archaeologist
permitted by the Arizona State Museum,
or a registered architect, as appropriate.
Following rezoning approval, any
subsequent development requiring a
Type II grading permit will be reviewed
for compliance with Pima County's
cultural resources requirements under
Chapter 18.81 of the Pima County
Zoning Code.
11. Natural Resources, Parks and
Recreation conditions:
A. The developer shall provide
appropriate utility easements and shall
construct a 2-inch water line stubbed out
to the northeastern edge of the
subdivision.
B. The developer shall be required to
construct trail improvements to trail #70
and #291.
C. The developer shall construct a
road per Pima County standards from
the northeastern corner of the
subdivision to Sahuarita Park Road.
12. Adherence to the preliminary
development plan as approved at public
hearing.
13. The site shall be surveyed for the
presence or absence of the cactus
ferruginous pygmy owl by a qualified
biological consultant who has a permit
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), unless USFWS determines a
survey is not required.
14. Prior to approval of the tentative
plat, surveying for Pima pineapple cacti
shall be conducted using United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
protocol. Development shall be
configured in a manner that disturbs the
least number of these plants as
possible. When disturbance is
unavoidable, all Pima pineapple cacti
shall, to the extent practicable, be
transplanted into suitable adjacent
habitat following transplantation
recommendation and guidelines
provided by the USFWS. Additional
mitigation required by the USFWS may
include purchasing and conserving
Pima pineapple cactus habitat
elsewhere. Mitigation shall occur prior to
or at the time of development."
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this was a rezoning from RH to
GR-1 on 87.3 acres to allow for 78 lots of
approximately one acre. The Planning
and Zoning Commission and Planning
staff recommended approval. There was
no protest to date.
The Chair inquired whether anyone in
opposition wished to address the Board?
No one appeared.
Dennis St. John, applicant, stated he
agreed to the conditions and standard
and special requirements.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Eckstrom, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to close
the public hearing and approve
Co9-02-17, subject to conditions and
standard and special requirements.
28. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
MODIFI CATION (SUBSTANTIAL
CHANGE) OF REZONING CONDITIONS
Co9-99-13, SGUTT FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP - COOL DRIVE NO. 3
REZONING
Request of Neil and Josefina Capin,
repre sented by Architectural Design
Group, Inc., for a modification
(substantial change) of re zoning
condition No. 12, which requires
adherence to the preliminary
development plan as presented at the
public hearing. The applicant proposes
to increase the allowable building lot
coverage from 25,707 square feet to
28,000 square feet. The subject site is
4.42 acres, conditionally zoned CB-2 in
1999, and is located at the northwest
corner of Cool Drive and Oracle Road,
approximately one quarter mile north of
Magee Road. On motion, the Planning
and Zoning Commission voted 8-0
(Commissioner Smith was absent) to
recommend APPROVAL WITH CONDI
TIONS. Staff recommends APPROVAL
WITH CONDITIONS. (District 1)
"IF THE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE OF
RE ZONING CONDITIONS IS
APPROVED, THE FOLLOWING
AMENDED AND ADDITIONAL
REZONING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED:
12. Adherence to the revised
preliminary development plan dated
January 2000 March 2003, as approved
at public hearing; includ ing gasoline
sales; total building square footage shall
not exceed 25,707 27,470 28,000 square
feet.
14. The buildings shall be oriented in
such a manner that the main access is
provided via Oracle Road, not Cool
Drive. Bay door openings for the
proposed tire store shall not open to the
west.
15. Internal circulation shall be
provided to all development within the
rezoning area."
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this was a rezoning for a
substantial change to a rezoning
condition. It would increase the building
block coverage to 28,000 square feet
and would substitute a tire store for a
restaurant pad. The property is on 4.24
acres, it was rezoned to CB-2 in 1999.
Staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval.
There was no protest.
The Chair inquired whether anyone in
opposition wished to address the
Board? No one appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Day, seconded by
Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to close
the public hearing and approve
Co9-99-13, subject to conditions.
29. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
Co8-03-02, QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL
USES (CHAPTER 18.12)
An ordinance of the Board of
Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona;
relating to zoning; amending the Pima
County Code by establishing a process
to permit a quasi-governmental use in
Chapter 18.12 (Institutional Reserve). On
motion, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 6-2 (Commissioners
Membrila and Spendiarian voted NAY,
Commissioner RedDog was absent) to
recommend DENIAL. Staff recommends
AP PROVAL. (All Districts)
If approved, pass and adopt:
ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - 41
Jim Mazzocco, Planning Official,
reported this was a Zoning Code Text
Amendment that would allow a
Quasi-Governmental use in the IR zone.
This means it would allow for a special
use permit at a Board of Supervisors
public hearing. This type of use is
basically a use that provides for a
governmental benefit but would be run
by a private entity. The Planning and
Zoning Commission has recommended
denial and Planning staff recommended
approval.
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to address the Board? No one
appeared.
On consideration, it was moved by
Supervisor Elias, seconded by
Supervisor Eckstrom, and unanimously
carried by a five to zero vote, to close
the public hearing and deny Co8-03-02
and Ordinance No. 2003 - 41 .
ADDENDUM I
30. PROCUREMENT: AGREEMENT,
CONTRACT AND/OR AMENDMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 76 ,
approving an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the State of Arizona,
Department of Transportation,
authorizing the construction of Wetmore
and Ruthrauff Roads from La Cholla
Boulevard to Fairview Avenue and
acquisition of Federal reimbursement
funds for the project, Bond and Impact
Fee Fund, estimated contract amount
$4,250,856.00; Federal Highway
Administration Fund, contract amount
$11,610,000.00 revenue
(01-04-A-132241-0403) Transportation
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by a five
to zero vote, to pass and adopt
Resolution No. 2003 - 76 .
31. BOARD, COMMISSION AND/OR
COMMITTEE
METROPOLITAN TUCSON
COMMISSION ON URBAN NATIVE
AMERICAN AFFAIRS
Appointment of Francis R. Beeman to
replace Janet Alaine Vargas. Term
expiration: 12/31/04. (District 4)
On consideration, it was moved by
Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor
Elias, and unanimously carried by five
to zero vote, to approve the
appointment.
32. CALL TO THE PUBLIC
The Chair inquired whether anyone
wished to be heard.
Debra Wilmer and Janet Searle,
representing Jobs With Justice, asked
the Board to send letters to El Rio
Health Center urging them to stop union
busting tactics and to bargain in good
faith with the union. Without union
representation, the employees would
have no voice on the job, decent health
care coverage nor anyone to uphold
employee rights.
33. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further business to
come before the Board, the meeting was
adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
Sharon Bronson CHAIR ATTEST: Lori
Godoshian, CLERK
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
June 5, 2026
5min(a)

\


MINUTES, KINO COMMUNITY
HOSPITAL GOVERNING BOARD
APRIL 8, 2026
The Pima County Kino
Community Hospital Governing
Board met in regular session in
the regular meeting place of the
Pima County Board of
Supervisors on the First Floor of
the Administration Building of
the Governmental Center,
Tucson, Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on
Tuesday, April 8, 2003. Upon roll
call, those present and absent
were as follows:
Present: Sharon Bronson,
Chair
Richard Elias, Vice Chair
Ray Carroll, Member
Ann Day, Member
Dan Eckstrom, Member
Lori Godoshian, Clerk
Absent: None
REGULAR AGENDA
1. MINUTES
Approval of Kino Community
Hospital Advisory Board
Minutes of February 20, 2003.
On consideration, it was
moved by Supervisor Elias,
seconded by Supervisor Carroll,
and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the
Kino Community Hospital
Advisory Board Minutes.
2. AGREEMENTS,
CONTRACTS AND/OR
AMENDMENTS
A. Arizona Home and
Healthcare, Amendment No. 4,
to provide nursing supplemental
staffing agreement for Kino
Hospital, ($920,000.00), and
Posada Del Sol ($129,000.00)
and extend contract term to
6/30/04, PHCS Enterprise Fund,
total contract amount
$1,040,000.00
(07-06-A-129586-0701)
B. Recall Secure Destruction
Services, Amendment No. 1, to
provide paper shredding
services, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount $5,000.00
(11-06-R-130366-0202)
C. First Correctional
Medical-Tucson L.L.C., to
provide hospital, laboratory and
clinical services for inmates and
detainees, PHCS Enterprise
Fund, contract amount
$100,000.00 revenue
(18-06-F-132152-0303)
D. Arizona Department of
Health Services, Amendment
No. 5, to provide Arizona State
Tobacco Tax Primary Care
Program and amend contractual
language, no cost
(01-06-A-128226-0200)
On consideration, it was
moved by Supervisor Elias,
seconded by Supervisor Carroll,
and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the
agreements, contracts, and/or
amendments.
3. RFP
1255-02 In-Patient Pharmacy
Management Software (Kino
Hospital/PHCS Enterprise Fund)
Meta Pharmacy Systems
(Corporate Headquarters: Floral
Park, NY) amount not to exceed
$169,410.00.
On consideration, it was
moved by Supervisor Elias,
seconded by Supervisor Carroll,
and unanimously carried by a
five to zero vote, to approve the
RFP as presented.
4. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further
business to come before the
Board, the meeting was
adjourned at 12:07 p.m.
Sharon Bronson CHAIR
ATTEST: Lori Godoshian,
CLERK
PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial
June 5, 2026
5minkgb kb

Public Notice ID: 1965490.HTM



 2000 Arizona Newspapers Association  All Rights Reserved.